On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, ravi wrote:
> a tangential thought: is the god hypothesis (which i do not subscribe
> to, btw) any sillier than a "lawful universe" hypothesis? because there
> is some (though not sufficient) "proof" for the latter?
>
> --ravi
A pragmatic argument: look what we've been able to accomplish with this "lawful universe" hypothesis! Perhaps you could buy Nietzsche's argument that it's a useful fiction?
Miles