[lbo-talk] Re: pseudoscience (was: let's talk about logic)

[Jim Devine]

Jeff writes: >... it seems to me that the burden of proof is on people
who want to make (especially really broad, ambiguous) assertions like
"real scientists reject religion" to explain what they mean...<

I'm reading a good book that seems relevant here, Bauer's _Science or
Pseudoscience_. He, a scientist himself, argues that sometimes -- on
the frontier of science -- it's really hard to draw the line between
science and pseudo.
JD