this is a joke, right?
<snip>
> For it is simply false. Almost all leftists have always been more than
> willing to work with -- in fact have worked with -- any xtians who were
> engated in struggling for progressive causes. What are you talking
> about?
this seems to me a fair question.
off the top of my head, i see two possible responses: (1) he's talking about chuck. (2) it's something else.
if it's not chuck, that can only be because we think chuck -- wrt religion -- represents a small minority in left organizing. right? because that kind of hostility in sufficient strength would constitute a reasonable response to your question?
so let's say it's not chuck and so it's something else. what could that other thing be that michael is talking about?
i can't say for sure that i know. but here's a guess. maybe it has to do with a struggle between us and the fundamentalists for the middle. and right now the bad guys are winning. so let's say you've got more or less mainstream christians with some views that we would like to associate with fundamentalism (e.g.: biblically-based homophobia). when life in america is cast as a culture war, and you're either with god or against god, believers will pick the side they think god is likeliest to be on -- or anyway, that god won't be against. if we can't convince them that god is likely on our side, then they will pick the rightwingers. not that they will turn into right-wingers, but they will choose specific sides on specific issues.
so, organizingly speaking, how do you talk to those people? well, really, you probably need other christians to talk to them, but in general we can probably say you don't bring them on board by comparing the object of their faith to santa claus. call me crazy. but we were saying most people don't do that, right? so how DO we organize ambivalent christians on an issue like gay marriage or gay rights generally?
there's a good practical question for chuck, come to think of it. i know how i try to do it, but i wonder how he would do it. or anyone else, for that matter.
j
-- http://www.brainmortgage.com/
Among medieval and modern philosophers, anxious to establish the religious significance of God, an unfortunate habit has prevailed of paying to Him metaphysical compliments.
- Alfred North Whitehead