If this is a concern, why not just the set X-No-Archive header? Then (a) archiving services won't archive the mail list (including ones you might not know about) and (b) people could still safely use services like gmane.
-- adam
On 6/22/05, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
> lbo at inkworkswell.com wrote:
>
> >At 01:15 AM 6/22/2005, Michael Perelman wrote:
> >
> >>Would that be difficult to do for pen-l?
> >
> >noper. Just subscribe pen-l here: http://gmane.org/subscribe.php
> >
> >If they approve of the list -- and they will -- they'll use a 'bot'
> >address to subscribe to pen-l. It will automatically archive the
> >list discussion, turn it into an RSS feed, and all the other nifty
> >things they have there.
> >
> >It's an open source project.
> >
> >I learned of it through our referrer logs. People already read LBO via gmane.
> >
>
> Jordan & I asked them to take it down because of the occasional but
> urgent necessity to remove posts from the archives.
>
> Speaking of which, we (meaning Jordan) will do that if necessary, but
> it does take some time, so please be careful about making sure the
> address in the To: field is the one you really want!
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>