Coincidentally, I also just looked through the abstracts of the SE Asia sessions of last year's AAS Annual Meeting. And I was just thinking how Asian studies shifts with the changing focus of Washington -- which perhaps should not be altogether surprising given the provenance of area studies, but was nevertheless surprising given the persons and personalities involved.
So I guess the blurb above, even against the expressed intent of the scholars themselves, might be applied to social science elsewhere, with the proviso that while, e.g., Indonesian social science is largely about and addressed to Indonesia, that in the centres of relative world power are about elsewhere addressed to themselves, even if the author of what is deemed worthy of attention is from that elsewhere.
It applies to this item -- by its multiple silences and absences, and amnesia, as also by the very framing of the matter, both of "democracy" and of "Islam", or more broadly, religion, in the context of Indonesia. And isn't it a bit rich to write "Moreover, the views of Islamists on a range of issues - from banking interest to birth control - are at odds with what the rest of the world has learned about economic development" when the US is putting pressure on the UN over abortion?
At 8:50 pm +0500 3/3/05, uvj at vsnl.com wrote:
>The Asian Age
>
>23 October 2004
>
>Indonesia: Democracy wins, but danger remains
>
>- By Sadanand Dhume
>