On Sun, 8 May 2005, Autoplectic wrote:
> What's independent of each can't be independent of all. He commits a
> fallacy of composition. Our understanding of the interdependency of
> intentionality and action has come a long way since H&M. The rhetoric
> of 'behind the backs of the producers' is way overblown.
>
Or perhaps philosophers embedded in capitalist social relations have become yet more elegant and clever about justifying their common-sense beliefs about intentionality and action!
Miles