[lbo-talk] Making beautiful stuff

Wojtek Sokolowski sokol at jhu.edu
Wed May 18 06:30:40 PDT 2005


Justin:
> Socialism and Art. He thought that the problem with
> capitalism was that it made everything ((including
> people) ugly, and that the working class deserved
> beauty and style.

I do not think it is capitalism per se - some of the ugliest creations were made under the Soviet style socialism.

The problem is not the mode of production itself, but populist tendencies embedded in it that drive everything to the lowest common denominator. In the Soviet-style socialism and, ironically, US brand of Puritanism this is manifested by conspicuous endorsement of "common men" and denouncing everything that smacked of elitism, especially the high culture. The plain and crude became beautiful.

Another manifestation of Puritanism is the so-called economic rationalism - which is an aesthetic belief rather than a bona fide attempt to maximize utility. Well designed and built things generally last longer - both physically and emotionally (i.e. people tend to keep them longer) - than cheaply produced crap. Therefore, manufacturing and pushing cheap crap is an expression of puritanical attitudes toward decorum which perceive it as unnecessary and "evil" frills.

It is not a coincidence that the people who brought us Puritanism were the same ones who gave us the "bottom-line" economic theory and practice.

Wojtek



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list