[lbo-talk] Reluctance, Rebellion and Death

Leigh Meyers leighcmeyers at gmail.com
Sat May 28 20:28:00 PDT 2005


---- Original Message ---- From: snitsnat To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Reluctance, Rebellion and Death


> At 06:02 PM 5/28/2005, Leigh Meyers wrote:
>
>> The correct position is,
>
> You wearing fuckme pumps when you say that, boy? </Mr. T>
>
>
>
> kelley
>
>

I've never heard Mr. T say... particularly that... Did I miss an episode? He's not my type Kelley. I much prefer *women* who look like him.

Pumps? Silbers.... I prefer Silbers(Men's 9E...). ... and chocolates... bring chocolates! (831)555-1212

Marvin Gandall...


>> I haven't the slightest idea what this screwball is referring to...
>> I've never held any position other than the immediate withdrawal of US
>> troops.
>> Some people can't read - or understand what they read.
>> MG

I'll restate the pertinent:

You said:
>> Charles is right: the US was clearly the aggressor in Iraq, but I
>> reject justifying the right of resistance to foreign occupation on
>> this basis alone, or even primarily.

I said: "Now that I'm done laughing at Mr. Gandalls position on... what the Iraqis should think about a foreign occupation..."

Who said anything about your position in regard to withdrawl?

I was just laughing because you implied the "right of resistance" *requires* justification from anyone besides the aggrieved party.

Then I went on to Doug's statement...


>>> Impertinent question! You should just know the correct position. No
>>> reporting, research, or thought required.
>>>
>>> Doug
. . . You are kind of casual about the insults. No comment on your reading comprehension from this end...

Leigh



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list