Actually, I don't think any of these is an impropable claim (one counter to the preponderance of evidence). The first is a demonstrably false assertion (proof: the concept of "God" is logically incompatible with the concept of existence as used in every statement except for that specific assertion). The second is an empirically undemonstrable interpretation of real past and present human experiences but arguably a poetic truth. The third is straight-out bullshit.
Shane Mage
"Thunderbolt steers all things...It consents and does not consent to be called Zeus."
Herakleitos of Ephesos