[lbo-talk] The Empire's Freedom

Wojtek Sokolowski sokol at jhu.edu
Fri Nov 4 08:30:40 PST 2005


Michael Hoover:


> liberal dems were, perhaps, done in by contradictions of their location in
political
> arena/along political spectrum, but they contributed mightily to current
situation
> (which has been mostly bad for working folks), maybe question that should
be asked
> is not why democratic party liberalism has been in eclipse, but why it was
successful
> at all... michael hoover

I am basically with you about the internal structural condition shifts and the Democrat failure to address burgeoning social problems - which perhaps is not a failure but a choice, since talking about social problems mobilizes more attention and support than actually solving them.

However, you seem to neglect the foreign policy dimension - after WW2 the US was in an intense competition with x-USSR for world domination, and the key Soviet strategy in that competition was to take advantage of the social problems created by the US-backed system. So the US elites had to do something about those problems - at least on the surface - to be competitive in the cold war. That can explain quite a bit why Democrat party liberalism scored some successes in between the late 1950s and 1970s and then has been in eclipse as the Soviet "threat" abated.

Wojtek



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list