wrote:
> there is a conspiracy or something right? because, I swear, y'all are
> posting things to the list making it impossible for me to get anything
> done. Boy, do I have a rant for this.
>
> At 05:13 PM 11/6/2005, Michael Hoover wrote:
>
>> below is - slightly altered - portion of post
>> that appeared on working class studies list,
>> any thoughts... mh
>>
>> what difference does it make to identify oneself
>> with the working class in higher education, an
>> institution that, among other things, perpetuates
>> class inequities?
>>
>> One reason working-class studies exists is to
>> increase attention to the working class in the
>> academy -- as a subject for serious study but
>> also as a legitimate position from which to speak.
>>
>> So my question is this: what will it take to create
>> such a change, to generate greater respect and
>> visibility for working-class people and working-class
>> studies in the academy?
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> Please Note:
>> Due to Florida's very broad public records law, most written
>> communications to or from College employees regarding College
>> business are public records, available to the public and media upon
>> request. Therefore, this e-mail communication may be subject to
>> public disclosure.
>>
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
> The Bitch | Lab
>
> Bitchier. Raunchier. Wonkette with 'tude -- for the feminist left
> http://blog.pulpculture.org
> http://www.pulpculture.org
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>