How odd. From earliest childhood I remember Christians describing the "blessed Trinity" as consisting of "God in Three *Persons*."
> The Greek
>philosophers at Chalcedon knew that they couldn't say that God
>and man are two of anything. There is no category to which
>they both belong (not even being or "things"). God and the
>universe don't add up to two (two what?). That's why the
>Incarnation isn't an example of hybridity -- like a mule or an
>ape-man. --CGE
>
>---- Original message ----
>>Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:02:37 -0400
>>From: Shane Mage <shmage at pipeline.com>
>>Subject: RE: [lbo-talk] more on the econ Nobel
>>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>>
>>C.G. Estabrook wrote:
>>>Your residual Catholicism is getting a bit rusty, Doug. The
>>>council of Chalcedon (451 CE) specifically rejected the notion
>>>that Christ was a hybrid. "Fully human," they said...
>>
>>But they also said "fully God," n'est-ce-pas? Today we would say
>>"fully dual-personalitied."
>>
>>Shane Mage
>>
>>"Thunderbolt steers all things...It consents and does not
>>consent to be called
>>Zeus."
>>
>>Herakleitos of Ephesos
>>
>>___________________________________
>>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk