[lbo-talk] IRS To Pay Buffett Firm More Than $23 Million

Mark Bennett mab at straussandasher.com
Mon Oct 31 07:58:05 PST 2005


Willy Greenfields

$23 million could well be a rounding error when you look at the amounts in question.

A striking passage from Berkshire's 2003 investor letter:

On May 20, 2003, The Washington Post ran an op-ed piece by me that was critical of the Bush tax proposals. Thirteen days later, Pamela Olson, Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy at the U.S. Treasury, delivered a speech about the new tax legislation saying, "That means a certain midwestern oracle, who, it must be noted, has played the tax code like a fiddle, is still safe retaining all his earnings." I think she was talking about me.

Alas, my "fiddle playing" will not get me to Carnegie Hall - or even to a high school recital. Berkshire, on your behalf and mine, will send the Treasury $3.3 billion for tax on its 2003 income, a sum equaling 2½% of the total income tax paid by all U.S. corporations in fiscal 2003. (In contrast, Berkshire's market valuation is about 1% of the value of all American corporations.) Our payment will almost 7 certainly place us among our country's top ten taxpayers. Indeed, if only 540 taxpayers paid the amount Berkshire will pay, no other individual or corporation would have to pay anything to Uncle Sam. That's right: 290 million Americans and all other businesses would not have to pay a dime in income, social security, excise or estate taxes to the federal government. (Here's the math: Federal tax receipts, including social security receipts, in fiscal 2003 totaled $1.782 trillion and 540 "Berkshires," each paying $3.3 billion, would deliver the same $1.782 trillion.)

__________________________________

FWIW, Buffett has long made a point of publicly declaring that he and Munger are happy to pay the full amount of individual and corporate tax they and Berkshire owe. They believe they get good value for what they pay. They probably do.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list