On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:52:12 -0400 Wojtek Sokolowski <sokol at jhu.edu>
writes:
> > ---- Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
> > > <http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm>
> > > ___________________________________
> > > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
> >
> > See this wording in polling always confuses me,
> >
> > Bush Job Approval
> >
> > Strongly Approve 23%
> > Somewhat Approve 23%
> > Somewhat Disapprove 14%
> > Strongly Disapprove 39%
> >
> >
> > To me "somewhat approve" is worse than "somewhat disapprove", but
> the way
> they are
> > ordered it seems like its a tiered system, of best to worst. I
> don't know
> how people taking
> > polls intrepret it, and it worries me about the accuracy of these
>
> WS:
>
> You are grasping for straws. The stupid fatheads that voted for him
> will
> support him even more, blaming everything on government bureaucrats.
> That
> is the Amrikun way - bad government good corporate and political
> bosses.
I don't know about that. A president who can't get a 10-15% bounce out of a natural disaster like Katrina is in pretty sorry shape IMO.
>
> Wojtek
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>