>
> So you're saying that you can't imagine a case where this
> would be true?
That's exactly what I'm saying. If he hasn't done anything, if he hasn't even talked about doing anything, then it's not just that I believe the U.S. shouldn't imprison him on some kind of moral or legalistic grounds, but it doesn't _make any sense_ to imprison him!
You quote the Washington Post:
> > There may be times when circumstances require the detention of
> > an American citizen fighting for the other side who, for some
> > reason, cannot be tried in civilian courts.
but I'm honestly at a loss here; what reason could that be?
Yours WDK - WKiernan at ij.net