On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Forbes does it all the time, and finds considerable turnover (though I
> can't remember the numbers, and don't have time to look them up). They
> like that, because it shows America is the endlessly self-renewing land of
> opp't'y, as they say in the want ads.
Right. But I wasn't clear. I didn't mean turnover in the 400 qua 400. I mean taking the 400 as a sample of the rich, and looking at the bios, how many of them were not rich 25 years ago?
Michael