Costs of big marches- Re: [lbo-talk] DC

Max B. Sawicky sawicky at bellatlantic.net
Sun Sep 25 11:43:38 PDT 2005


The presumption that the fabled $12 million is available for other purposes is groundless. It isn't. If people are willing to buy a million dollars worth of pizza, it does not follow that they would forego pizza and spend instead on Brussels sprouts.

I also find it amusing that Nathan is aggrieved that more people gravitate towards fun than towards work. ANSWER is the McDonald's of today's protest politics. They know what people want. Nathan doesn't realize, life is short, so we eat dessert first. If we lived in Newman Nation, we wouldn't be having this conversation. We would be in earnest three-hour meetings on urban planning.

For the maximization of fun,

mbs

-----Original Message----- From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]On Behalf Of Nathan Newman Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 1:22 PM To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Subject: Re: Costs of big marches- Re: [lbo-talk] DC

----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Henwood" <dhenwood at panix.com>
>Sure they are-- but are they necessary at a national level, where travel
>costs time and money?

-Networking, man. Isn't it important for sympathetic people to meet -each other, make friends, share strategies, and generally feel less -lonely? I agree with you on the importance of institution-building, -but the affective side counts too.

I'm not against all marches and such. I'm just against the single-minded focus on them among too many activists, abetted by the ANSWER folks who are incapable of any other organizing.

And it's a reasonable debate on resources to ask whether the networking on a national basis is worth $12 million? A lot of folks are allergic to leadership but it's cheaper to elect delegates to a national meeting do that networking, while other folks do other tasks.

Part of what bothers me is that marches are more fun than other political work and we basically have the national leadership spending their time telling people that the best use of their money and time is to eat dessert.

So they spend $12 million and 2 million volunteer hours on dessert, while leaving most day-to-day organizing on antiwar work chronically underfunded and with with few volunteer hours on boring outreach work.

My criticism is of the antiwar leadership. If they were spending most of their time promoting institution-building and the more prosaic mobilization work, I'd be far more friendly to the occasional march to raise morale.

But it's the disproportion between priorities that gets my ire.

Nathan

___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list