>or maybe it just took her this long to come up with a plausible
>version of events that does not implicate... judith miller.
Today's Note repeats the questions that yesterday's edition opened with, along with some comments/answers. This one...
>Is the Fitzgerald leak investigation about to trump everything else?
>(And we don't mean the Judy Miller part.) (We tried to warn all
>y'all about Miller, so don't ignore the first part of yesterday's
>item.)
...is incredibly intriguing. Wonder what they have in mind.
Doug