<HTML><HTML>In a message dated 5/11/05 2:15:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lbo-talk-request@lbo-talk.org writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">My first reaction on reading this was that the reason anarchism has received so little academic attention is that few people remain anarchists after their 30th birthday. But I dismissed the thought as too cruel & glib. Doug </BLOCKQUOTE> Maybe a slightly less glib and cruel way of putting it is that whatever anarchist theoretical tradition may exist is (how shall I put it?) a little on the thin side. (No disrespect to Graeber or indifference to his fate at Yale is implied.) </HTML>