<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">In a message dated 5/29/05 12:38:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lbo-talk-request@lbo-talk.org writes:<BR>
<BR>
>From a Financial Times article sent by Marvin Gandall<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Finally, there is a sense in which even the private sector believes his<BR>
ideology could help him. Mr Fox tried to raise taxes and privatise the<BR>
energy network from the political right. But many in Mexico believe that a<BR>
politician of the opposite stripe might be more successful, pointing to the<BR>
progress made elsewhere in Latin America by left-leaning politicians. "The<BR>
Lula effect will be here big time," says one businessman. "By that, I mean<BR>
the belief that only someone from the left can carry out some of the<BR>
reforms. Only Nixon could approach China."<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
I don't understand how you can be friendly to social democracy while at the same time supplying a perfect example of how social democrats in power function. They trade on their leftist credentials to ease the introduction of neoliberal policies that traditional rightists would have a harder time implementing because they lack such credentials.</FONT></HTML>