<html><body>
<DIV>So it was the capitalists that imposed a tax on their own petrochemical exports from Bolivia - just out of the goodness of their hearts and not in response to the demand of total expropriation by the popular movement? How do you explain the resignation of successive Presidents of Bolivia and Ecuador if not by pressure from mass popular demonstrations? Was it the capitalists, out of the goodness of their own hearts, that decided to let Hugo Chavez return to power after the coup in 2002 and not the fact that his supporters took the streets? I don't think that capitalists are prone to just hand out money because they feel like it or to remove heads of goernment on a whim, even less to restore to power Hugo Chavez, whom they loath and have sworn to destroy. How else do you explain such things? What other factors do you have? Conspiracies perhaps? SR</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR><BR>> <BR>> So tell us more, comrade, what evidence do you have of those capitalists <BR>> running scare, and what evidence do you have that if they indeed are <BR>> rethinking their policy it is an effect of a street mob rather than other <BR>> factors (concerns over their own wealth? Demands form other capitalists? <BR>> Concerns over the wealth of the national economy - yes, these guys want to <BR>> preside over a functioning economy, not a wreck). <BR>> <BR> <BR>> <BR>> Wojtek <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ___________________________________ <BR>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk </BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>