<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"> <title></title> </head> <body> Doug Henwood wrote: <blockquote type="cite" cite="midp06230928bfa9598f34ec@%5B10.0.1.2%5D"> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite">  My results are too depressing to report.</blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> There were a few questions I couldn't answer: like who should die me? or 10 other people.... which other people??? Bush's cabinet maybe? As for the results,  nice sobriquet but maybe just short for "stuck up." _________________________________________________________________________________________ <blockquote type="cite" cite="midp06230928bfa9598f34ec@%5B10.0.1.2%5D"> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> Colorful, but unpicked. You are The Wild Rose.     Prone to bouts of cynicism, sarcasm, and thorns, you excite a certain kind of woman. Hoping to gather you up, she flirts and winks and asks you out, ultimately professing her love. Then you make her bleed. Why? Because you're the rare, independent, self-sufficient kind of woman who does want love, but not from a weakling.     You don't seem to take yourself too seriously, and that's refreshing. You aren't uptight; you don't over-plan. Romance-wise, sex isn't a top priority--a true relationship would be preferable. For your age, you haven't had a lot of bonafide love experience, though, and this kind of gets to core of the issue. You're very selective.   The problem is them, not you, right? You have lofty standards that few measure up to. You're out there all right, but not to be picked up by just anyone. ---------------- Well, like Kell said, if you say "bi" -- you just get categorized as lez. I wonder what they mean by "love experience"? ..."sex"??? Joanna </body> </html>