>If he isn't useful, by definition he's outside the needs of class struggle,
>since anything that serves such needs is by definition useful.
>
>-- Nathan Newman
-Which means you get to decide, right? and not "the people" -- those common =folk -- you're supposedly speaking for. White boy! Please!
What's that crap? Doug said Zizek didn't have to be useful and that's what I was responding to.
I give up-- sign off.
Nathan Newman