[lbo-talk] Fact-checking Anonymous Sources?

Jim Devine jdevine03 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 12 09:33:17 PDT 2006



> Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
> >Doug wrote: "A New Yorker fact-checker told me that they put Hersh
> >through the wringer on his pieces. The magazine, already notorious for
> >the rigor of its routine checking, goes into high gear for his stuff."
> >
> >Almost all claims made in the Seymour Hersh article about nuking Iran
> ><http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/060417fa_fact> are based on
> >anonymous sources. How can New Yorker fact-check stuff coming from
> >anonymous sources like them?

On 4/12/06, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
> Because he has to disclose the sources to his editor. You think
> they'd just run stuff on Hersh's word?

it sure seems as if the WaPo runs some stuff based on Woodward's word alone. -- Jim Devine / "There can be no real individual freedom in the presence of economic insecurity." -- Chester Bowles



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list