[lbo-talk] Fact-checking Anonymous Sources?

Michael Hoover hooverm at scc-fl.edu
Thu Apr 13 12:19:29 PDT 2006



>>> dhenwood at panix.com 04/13/06 2:39 PM >>>
Michael Hoover wrote:
>forget who said that d.c. is only known vessel to leak from the top,
>stuff that
>gets uncovered is almost always because someone *high* in government -
>be s/he dissident, malcontent, servant, president - wants stuff uncovered...

True of a lot of the stuff you read in the NYT or WP. But that's not the way Hersh works - he gets his stuff from people further down the ladder who don't like the way things are being done. I feel offended on Hersh's behalf that he's essentially being accused of carrying water for the Bush admin. The man is a national treasure and deserves a lot better than that. Doug <<<<<>>>>>

didn't realize *i* accused hersh of being bush water boy, i didn't even mention him in either of my posts about leaks to lbo...

for the record: i've read hersh ever since my lai, have generally liked his stuff, he may be most important u.s. investigative journalist of last several decades...

as for how he works, i'm well-aware that he has often relied upon dissenters, however, he's also used senior officials as in story he wrote - last year? - about u.s. reconnaissance missions into iran... mh



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list