This is NOT a Security Council Resolution, it is no more than a statement by the President of the Security Council (the Presidency rotates each month). The US/UK/France sought to have a Resolution and this modality was rejected, in a sometimes bitter dispute (as was much of the proposed language). While a Presidential Statement is usually fully negotiated, it is technically no more than the President's personal sense of Council opinion. Unlike a Resolution, it has no standing under international law (don't ask).
I take the time to remind us of this because one suspects that in coming weeks "they" will try to fudge this point and claim far more international legitimacy than was in fact given.
Paul
>SECURITY COUNCIL, IN PRESIDENTIAL STATEMENT, UNDERLINES IMPORTANCE OF IRAN 'S
>
>RE-ESTABLISHING FULL, SUSTAINED SUSPENSION OF URANIUM-ENRICHMENT ACTIVITIES
>
>Calls on Iran to Take Steps Required by IAEA Board
>Of Governors; Requests Report from IAEA Director General in 30 Days
>
>Noting with serious concern Iran's resumption of uranium enrichment-related
..........