>Apocalypse near (Yideoth Aharonoth interviews Noam Chomsky
Chomsky is quoted as saying:
> "It is commonly said that the 'international community' has called on
> Iran to abandon its legal right to enrich uranium. That is true,
> if we
> define the “international community” as Washington and whoever happens
> to go along with it. It is surely not true of the world. The non-
> alignedcountries have forcefully endorsed Iran’s “inalienable
> right” to enrich
> uranium.
Iran's has "inalienable right" to enrich uranium for_peaceful purposes_under the NPT. This right has also been affirmed by recent IAEA resolutions. What is in question is whether Iran's nuclear programme really involves uranium enrichment for peaceful purposes. Ref. the appended news report in Guardian regarding building the core of the nuclear warhead blueprint obtained by the IAEA from Iran. Iran got the blueprint from AQ Khan.
Ulhas
Guardian Unlimited http://www.guardian.co.uk/
Iranians admit receiving nuclear warhead blueprint from disgraced Pakistani expert http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1646186,00.html
Ian Traynor in Zagreb Saturday November 19, 2005 The Guardian
International suspicion of Iran's nuclear programme heightened yesterday when it was revealed that Tehran had obtained a blueprint showing how to build the core of a nuclear warhead.
Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told diplomats that his inspectors had recently obtained documents from Tehran showing that the Iranians had been given various instructions on processing uranium hexafluoride gas and casting and enriching uranium. These had been obtained via the black market in nuclear technology headed by the disgraced Pakistani scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan.
Informed diplomats said the blueprint for casting uranium was required in making the core of a nuclear warhead, although that alone was not enough for the manufacture of a weapon.
United Nations inspectors had long suspected that the Khan network had helped Iran, but this was the first time the Iranians had come clean on the issue. They told the inspectors they had not sought the information, but that the Khan network had supplied the documents anyway.
This claim stretched credulity among diplomats and nuclear experts, and reinforced their conviction that Tehran is determined to acquire the capacity and knowhow for nuclear weapons.
Dr ElBaradei's disclosure came in a five-page confidential report to diplomats, ahead of a meeting of the 35-strong IAEA board on the Iranian dispute next week. It comes a day after the Guardian reported that the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had conducted a purge of his opponents in key ministries - drawing accusations of a coup.
Iran, meanwhile, displayed further defiance of the IAEA yesterday by announcing it had started processing more uranium for its nuclear programme.
Dr ElBaradei, the recent Nobel peace prizewinner, criticised Iran for continuing to withhold information on the project, demanding access for his inspectors to two Iranian military sites and to personnel involved in the programme.
He reiterated that Iranian "transparency" was "indispensable and overdue". Amid frantic behind-the-scenes diplomacy aimed at building a broader international consensus on how to respond to the Iranian nuclear challenge, Tehran's chief nuclear negotiator announced that more uranium ore was being processed into gas for nuclear fuel purposes at the conversion complex in Isfahan.
While the Iranian move was no surprise, its timing was seen as a signal of intransigence, less than a week before the IAEA board session.
In the run-up to next week's Vienna session, the US, Russia, Britain and other main European players have been working with Dr ElBaradei to finalise an offer to the Iranians that would leave them with a civil nuclear power programme but deny them the capacity to manufacture weapons-grade uranium.
Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, has asked Dr ElBaradei to travel to Iran to put the proposal to the Iranians - a mission in which, informed diplomats say, the Russians are the linchpin.
US, European, and Russian officials were meeting in London yesterday to discuss the proposals and also to try to come up with a common strategy on Iran.
The deal on offer would leave the Iranians processing uranium ore at the Isfahan plant, but forfeiting their proposed uranium enrichment complex at Natanz, where they want to build a large underground facility to process uranium gas into nuclear fuel.
The offer has the support of the Europeans, the Americans, the Russians and of Dr ElBaradei - placing Tehran under increased pressure.
In September, the IAEA board resolved to report Iran to the UN security council for breaches of its international nuclear commitments. But it did not set a date for such referral.
Backstory
Iran's game of nuclear cat and mouse with the west and UN nuclear inspectors goes back to early 2003 when Mohamed ElBaradei, the IAEA chief, visited the planned uranium enrichment plant at Natanz and was staggered by what he found. Iran had been covertly building and planning its nuclear projects for 18 years undetected. Since then, IAEA inspections have been the main subject of 13 reports by Dr ElBaradei to his board. The disclosures led, in turn, to the uncovering later in 2003 of the international trafficking in nuclear and weapons technology headed by Abdul Qadeer Khan, seen as the father of Pakistan's atomic bomb. But the UN inspections of Iranian sites have yet to provide conclusive evidence to show whether Tehran's nuclear projects are designed solely for energy or also for weapons.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2006