On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, ravi wrote:
> I don't think that's the meaning the author intended with "No
> Alternative". It seems from your note that you have made peace with
> yourself on this thread, and that is a good thing!
>
> --ravi
At this point, it's pretty clear that ravi only read the title of the article. As people have repeatedly pointed out, it is not a slam piece on "alternative" medicine; it points out the effectiveness of a number of alternative remedies, as determined by scientific testing. I think a better read of the title is "no alternative to scientific assessment of claims".
Miles