[lbo-talk] Noam takes on the 9/11 conspiracists

[ravi]

At around 17/8/06 3:22 pm, Doug Henwood wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:09 PM, ravi wrote:
> 
>> Ah, well I guess I didn't hear that. But let me try to save my case by
>> clarifying that my essential point is that if questions are raised, one
>> can ignore them (on the basis of lack of time) or address them
>> rationally. Not dismiss them using a phrase like "conspiracy theory".
> 
> How about "psychotically delusional"? Would that pass muster?
>

First of all let me note that this is a losing battle for me since I am
limited to the three-post quota (and this is my third!) ;-).

And no, psychotically delusional will not pass muster. Perhaps
parsimony-challenged?

	--ravi

-- 
Support something better than yourself: ;-)
PeTA:       http://www.peta.org/
GreenPeace: http://www.greenpeace.org/
If you have nothing better to do: http://platosbeard.org/