Elsewhere in this thread a certain Jerry Monaco has put forward a rather nonsensical assessment of 'conspiranoids' employing a device favored by those in the pro-official story camp - wherein you don't actually argue the points raised by those skeptical on the official story, but instead create intellectual parodies or caicatures of same and then have a field day arguing against those.
9-11 is not a 'special' issue, it is no different than any other political phenomena, try thinking about it that way and drop the 'conspiranoid' stuff, lets just use plain English (or whatever language one chooses).
Joe W.
> From: dhenwood at panix.com> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Noam takes on the 9/11 conspiracists> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:37:47 -0400> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org> > > On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Jerry Monaco wrote:> > > On 8/17/06, Doug Henwood < dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:Hmm, he's > > refused to do this on my show, out of fear of all the flak> > he'd take from the conspiracoids,> > Doug> > ___________________________________> >> >> > JM: Is this your interpretation of why he refused, conclusion from > > contextual evidence, or did he tell you something along this lines?> >> > It was explicit.> > Doug> ___________________________________> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20060818/4fd0ecbd/attachment.htm>