[lbo-talk] Lind: Why Israel Lost

Victor victor at kfar-hanassi.org.il
Sun Aug 20 03:26:14 PDT 2006


Lind's focus on a particular set of military techniques misses the point entirely.

By restricting explanations for the success of Hezbollah and other similar Islamic parties and states entirely on military method he ignores on the one hand the social and political relations within these organizations that make these techniques possible, and on the other, the manner in which these techniques produce social conditions that perpetuate their utility for these organizations. It's the typical error of focusing on the effectivity of the weapon rather than on the men that use it. Victor Friedlander-Rakocz victor at kfar-hanassi.org.il ----- Original Message ----- From: "mike larkin" <mike_larkin2001 at yahoo.com> To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 3:50 Subject: [lbo-talk] Lind: Why Israel Lost


> http://counterpunch.org/lind08182006.html
>
>
> Why the IDF Lost in Lebanon
> Beaten
>
> By WILLIAM S. LIND
>
> With today's cease-fire in Lebanon, the second
> Hezbollah-Israeli War is temporarily in remission. So
> far, Israel has been beaten.
>
> The magnitude of the defeat is considerable. Israel
> appears to have lost at every level-strategic,
> operational and tactical. Nothing she tried worked.
> Air power failed, as it always does against an enemy
> who doesn't have to maneuver operationally, or even
> move tactically for the most part. The attempts to
> blockade Lebanon and thus cut off Hezbollah's resupply
> failed; her caches proved ample. Most seriously, the
> ground assault into Lebanon failed. Israel took little
> ground and paid heavily in casualties for that. More,
> she cannot hold what she has taken; if she is not
> forced to withdraw by diplomacy, Hezbollah will push
> her out, as it did once before. The alternative is a
> bleeding ulcer that never heals.
>
> But these failures only begin to measure the magnitude
> of Israel's defeat. While Hezbollah's leader, Sheik
> Hassan Nasrallah, is now an Islamic hero, Olmert has
> become a boiled brisket in the piranha pool that is
> Israeli politics. The cease-fire in Lebanon will allow
> camera crews to broadcast the extent of the
> destruction to the world, with further damage to
> Israel's image. Israel's "wall" strategy for dealing
> with the Palestinians has been undone; Hamas rockets
> can fly over a wall as easily as Hezbollah rockets
> have flown over Israel's northern border.
>
> Most importantly, an Islamic Fourth Generation entity,
> Hezbollah, will now point the way throughout the Arab
> and larger Islamic world to a future in which Israel
> can be defeated. That will have vast ramifications,
> and not for Israel alone. Hundreds of millions of
> Moslems will believe that the same Fourth Generation
> war that defeated hated Israel can beat equally-hated
> America, its "coalitions" and its allied Arab and
> Moslem regimes. Future events seem more likely to
> confirm that belief than to undermine it.
>
> The cease-fire in Lebanon will last only briefly, its
> life probably measured in days if not in hours.
> Neither Israel nor Hezbollah has genuinely accepted
> it. The notion that the Lebanese Army and a rag-tag
> U.N. force will disarm Hezbollah is absurd even by the
> usual low standard of diplomatic fictions. The bombing
> and the rocketing may stop briefly, but Israel has
> already announced a campaign of assassination against
> Hezbollah leaders, while every Israeli soldier in
> Lebanon will remain a target of Hezbollah.
>
> Unfortunately for states generally, Israel appears to
> have no good options when hostilities recommence. It
> can continue to grind forward on the ground in
> southern Lebanon, paying bitterly for each foot of
> ground, and perhaps eventually denying Hezbollah some
> of its rocket-launching sites. But it cannot hold what
> it takes. It may strive for a more robust U.N. force,
> but what country wants to fight Hezbollah? Any
> occupier of southern Lebanon that is not there with
> Hezbollah's permission will face the same guerrilla
> war Israel already fought and lost. Most probably,
> Israel will escalate by taking the war to Syria or
> Iran, and what will be a strategy of desperation. That
> too will fail, after it plunges the whole region into
> a war the outcome of which will be catastrophic for
> the United States as well as for Israel.
>
> Before that disastrous denouement, my Fourth
> Generation crystal ball suggests the following events
> are likely:
>
> o Again, a near-term resumption of hostilities
> between Israel and Hezbollah, with Israel succeeding
> no better than it has to date. In the past, the IDF
> has been brilliant at pulling rabbits out of hats, but
> this time someone else seems to occupy all the rabbit
> holes.
>
> o A fracturing of Lebanon, with a collapse of the
> weak Lebanese state and very possibly a return to
> civil war there (which was always the probable result
> of Syria's departure).
>
> o A rise of Syrian and Iranian influence
> generally, matched by a fall of American influence. If
> Israel and America were clever, Syria's comeback could
> offer a diplomatic opportunity of a deal in which
> Syria changed sides in return for a peace treaty with
> Israel that included the return of all lands. The
> crystal ball says that opportunity will be spurned.
>
> o A vast strengthening of Islamic 4GW elements
> everywhere.
>
> o Finally and perhaps most discouragingly, a
> continued inability of state militaries everywhere,
> including those of Israel and the United States, to
> come to grips with Fourth Generation War. Inability
> may be too kind of a word; refusal is perhaps more
> accurate.
>
> Are there any brighter prospects? Not unless Israel
> changes its fundamental policy. Even in the unlikely
> event that the cease-fire in Lebanon holds and
> Lebanese Army and U.N. forces do wander into southern
> Lebanon, that would buy but a bit of time. Israel only
> has a long-term future if it can reach a mutually
> acceptable accommodation with its neighbors. So long
> as those neighbors are states, a policy of pursuing
> such an accommodation may have some chance of success.
> But as the rise of Fourth Generation elements such as
> Hezbollah and Hamas weaken and in time replace those
> states, the possibility will disappear. Unfortunately,
> Israeli politics appear to be moving away from such a
> course rather than toward it.
>
> For America, the question is whether Washington will
> continue to demand that we go down with the Israeli
> ship.
>
> William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion,
> is Director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism
> for the Free Congress Foundation.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.2/422 - Release Date: 17/08/06
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list