[lbo-talk] Now, this is getting absurd

Chris Doss lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 1 06:46:48 PST 2006


Sean Andrews: In this case, it would seem that it is a draw whether it matters more for Putin/Russia to have a pristine image abroad or a reputation for being a hardass at home. The latter seems to be a more regular concern but that is not close to being enough evidence: it just casts some doubt on the cost/benefit argument offered here.

---

Practically no one in Russia had ever heard of Litvinenko until this happened. My roommate had no idea who he was.

If the FSB wanted to create a domestic reputation that Putin is a hardass, they could have gone after Berezovsky or Zakayev, who are people that (sort-of) matter, and that people in Russia have heard of.

This whole thing gives the impression of being stage-managed for maximum effect. Using a substance that creates panic and takes a long time to kill, for one.

The only real surface flaw I see in the BAB theory (BAB had every motive and he had the means and opportunity) is the likely possibility that L would figure it out and go public, which would be bad for BAB. But then L has a family...

This is speculation of course, but it has the advantage of actually making some sense.

Practically everyone in Russia thinks it was either BAB or some faction in the elite trying to use the event somehow to manipulate the situation after Putin leaves in 2008. That's interesting in itself: the Westerners (at least the Americans and Brits) automatically blamed Putin and the Russians automatically blamed BAB.

Then it could have been somebody else. L was involved in a very dirty business. But then why use such a weird substance?

____________________________________________________________________________________ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list