I recall looking at your blog (or by an anarchist by the name Chuck who sounded like you), and already noted this claim of yours. I merely disagree.
Respectfully, I find your claims on this forum tend to have low credibility (and I do spend time checking them out). Particularly as you don't back up your claims -- and unfortunately you're taken as some representative of anarchism as a whole. And you do nothing to deflect that perception.
> It might help if Angelus explained what he means by "ideology-critique."
> Is this some kind of academic thing I'm unfamiliar with?
I googled it before I posted, to get a basic idea. So you responded to him in a brusque manner, without knowing what it means?
For an anarchist source on how to listen to people you're criticizing, google up prof Mark Lance's talk on Unwelcome Guests, where he talks about how part of honest communication is actually LISTENING to people.
Tayssir