So I opened this thread hoping actually to read lbo-listers responses, arguments, ideas, descriptions of New Orleans. The Gods and Heroes of the threads (Chronos and Ariadne, no doubt) must have driven me made with rational expectations.
Does anyone actually have any thoughts about what is happening to the people of New Orleans? Any news, information, beliefs about how this all factors into the political/economic system?
Just asking.
Jerry
On 12/18/06, Wojtek Sokolowski <sokol at jhu.edu> wrote:
>
> Steven:
>
> Well, in this country social assistance has been in recent years and
> decades handled by private charities or by government funded non profits.
> This is not somethng that can be blamed, exclusively, or even primarily, on
> the current US administration as the practice goes back decades, at least to
> the 1980s and even earlier.
>
>
>
> [WS:] This is mixing apples and oranges. Government funded nonprofits and
> private foundations are two different things. Foundations are merely a
> funding source, and a minor one. Total private giving in the US, most of
> which is not foundations grants but individual giving to religion, is barely
> above 1% of the GDP in total, which is a drop in a bucket of what government
> spends on education and social programs (about 15% on social programs and
> 5.7% on education, which is over 20 % of the GDP.)
>
>
>
> So foundation giving is really tiny comparing to combining operating
> budgets of service delivery organizations, a great share of which are indeed
> nonprofit. What is more, foundations generally do not cover operating
> expenses of social programs (which are funded either by government, sales or
> program service charges) – they tend to fund pilot programs, innovations,
> arts, research etc, as well a great deal of programs in the developing
> countries – which is a much more effective use of their tiny (comparing to
> the need) resources. What is more, they fund those programs from their **investment
> income** i.e. returns they receive from investing their assets, rather
> than by distributing the assets themselves. Therefore, I found the remark
> citing $500 in assets in the context of reproach for not distributing it to
> the needy laughable, Dwayne. Foundations do not distribute their assets!
> This would be like GM selling their plants and machinery to cover their
> operating expenses.
>
>
>
> In short, the main player in social service provision is government not
> private philanthropy. The latter is mainly a conservative myth, and I find
> it ironic that the self-styled radicals swallow that myth wholesale. OTOH,
> I do not find it surprising. This society needs demons to function, and
> finds its demons according to the ideological orientation: the right finds
> it abroad, in the UN and the liberal establishment, the left finds it in the
> middle class and the liberal establishment, and most find in the
> government.
>
>
>
>
>
> Wojtek
>
>
>
> PS. Can I ask you guys a favor NOT to post HTML formatted text to this
> list? MS Outlook by default assumes the same format for the reply as in the
> original message, and it is difficult to remove.
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20061219/3c37e12b/attachment.htm>