[lbo-talk] Hillis Miller on de Man, Marx, & the Internet

Mike B) swillsqueal at yahoo.com.au
Sat Dec 23 17:28:37 PST 2006


At 12:39 PM 12/22/2006, Carl Remick wrote:
>>From: joanna <123hop at comcast.net>
>>
>>bitch wrote:
>>
>>>and what the hell with the blow job thing. y'all are not keeping my
>>>spirits up and I'm very disappointed. get to work!
>>
>>As one of two women regularly writing to this list, I feel, hmmmm, self
>>conscious talking about that.
>
>That's why they call it a hmmmm-er.
>
>Ho ho ho,
>
>Carl

Bitch (aka "K") wrote:

people! you can do better than that! is a blow job inherently oppressive, yes or no? Is it so gross, that it can never be an act between equal. must blowjobs be abolished in the name of liberation.

i mean,just at the heart of the whole thing, her statement (one Twsity Faster), is kind of annoying in so far as it wipes out the existence of male hummer performers.

also, let's just do the semiotics of blow jobs. Is it ever the case that popular culture represents a blow job as anything other than demeaning to women. See, after thinking about ti and interviewing testosterone central, I think not. hummers are always represented as a demeaning act produced by someone submissive. what the fuck is up with that!?

it's wrong! *******************************

Only if it's a real dominance and submission power play. 69 is a nice equal number....and then there's just plain mutualism, the condition for the oral sexual pleasure of one is the condition for the oral sexual pleasure of the other.

And remember that old Mary Hartman slogan, "foreplay is fair play".

Hi-ho,

Mike B)

Watch the communist manifestoon! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1oGIffyVVk

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list