Sure. It's like when someone does a drive-by flame against a relatively benevolent CEO which forum participants were admiring, just because the CEO engages in some of the predictable mundane corporate horrors. Maybe our anticorporate crusader helps some already-curious people over the edge into a serious questioning of corporations, but I suspect mostly solidifies stereotypes of activists as frothing antisocial lunatics. Effectively becomes a pro-corporate spokesperson.
Many experience vertigo from critiques of corporations. ("What do you replace them with!? Communism?") Same with critiques of nation-states, among those who focus on more benevolent forms of governance.
> Which part of anti-authoritarianism do you not understand? Which part of
> propaganda by the deed do you not understand? Do you get that anarchism
> is an anti-statist movement?
My understanding is that self-described anarchists should demonstrate principles of cooperation and sympathy enough to explain why they believe as they do. Otherwise it's harder to imagine how bottom-up societies might work in practice.
Tayssir