[lbo-talk] Short-Term Tactics at Odds with Medium-Term Needs

Jim Devine jdevine03 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 12 12:15:58 PST 2006



>gompers railed against variety of turn-of-20th century/so-called
progressive era state-based 'reform' programs, including national health insurance, on grounds that they would hurt labor organizing ... *and* that they stemmed from technocratic - not gompers word - view that claimed to know not only what workers wanted, but what was best for them as well...<

there's a certain truth to G's insight. Here in California -- especially Los Angeles, it seems -- we have been the beneficiaries of a lot of "progressive era state-based 'reform' programs." Like having a elected but "nonpartisan" mayor who doesn't have much power. Like having a county government with lots of power but whose chief executive isn't elected. The recall and state-wide initiative laws were also progressive "reforms," but these generally democratic measures are two-edged swords that typically cut to the right because of the continuing and worsening inequality between classes. -- Jim Devine Bust Big Brother Bush!



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list