[lbo-talk] Annexing Khuzestan; Battle-Plans for Iran?

Dwayne Monroe idoru345 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 21 09:35:15 PST 2006


I have no idea if the assertions made in this piece are true or not (and there are details that seem very questionable from my POV). However, Washington's fixation on Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program is a curious thing that leads, once you remove from consideration rhetoric about "giving nukes to terrorists", worries about 'instability' and other warm fuzzy cable news chat show fantasies, to a simple question:

what is their actual goal?

The author insists the objective is seizure of Iran's Khuzestan region, reportedly the heart of her oil production industry. He acknowledges an all out assault upon and occupation of Iran is beyond the US' capabilities but, he says, since this isn't the Bush admin's intention, clinging to that fact as an anchor of hope that war against Iran won't come is misguided.

Of course, Washington's desire to prevent conversion of petro-currency from dollars to Euros figures prominently in this scenario (economists will know better than I if this is an actual worry).

In any event, even if this particular description proves to be off-target, there is surely something especially foul afoot.

==================

Annexing Khuzestan; Battle-Plans for Iran

In less than 24 hours the Bush administration has won impressive victories on both domestic and foreign policy fronts.

At home, the far-right Federalist Society alum, Sam Alito, has overcome the feeble resistance from Democratic senators; ensuring his confirmation to the Supreme Court. Equally astonishing, the administration has coerced both Russia and China into bringing Iran before the United Nations Security Council although (as Mohamed ElBaradei says) “There’s no evidence of a nuclear weapons program.” The surprising capitulation of Russia and China has forced Iran to abandon its efforts for further negotiations; cutting off dialogue that might diffuse the volatile situation.

“We consider any referral or report of Iran to the Security Council as the end of diplomacy,” Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, told state television.

The administration’s success with Iran ends the diplomatic charade and paves the way for war. Now, UN Ambassador John Bolton will appear before the Security Council making spurious allegations of “noncompliance” that will rattle through the corporate media and prepare the world for unilateral military action.

The administration has no hope of securing the votes needed for sanctions or punitive action. The trip to the Security Council is purely a ploy to provide the cover of international legitimacy to another act of unprovoked aggression. The case has gone as far as it will go excluding the requisite “touched up” satellite photos and bogus allegations of unreliable dissidents.

We should now be focused on how Washington intends to carry out its war plans, since war appears to be inevitable.

Those who doubt that the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld team will attack Iran, while so conspicuously overextended in Iraq, are ignoring the subtleties of the administration’s Middle East strategy.

Bush has no intention of occupying Iran. Rather, the goal is to destroy major weapons-sites, destabilize the regime, and occupy a sliver of land on the Iraqi border that contains 90% of Iran’s oil wealth. Ultimately, Washington will aim to replace the Mullahs with American-friendly clients who can police their own people and fabricate the appearance of representative government. But, that will have to wait. For now, the administration must prevent the incipient Iran bourse (oil-exchange) from opening in March and precipitating a global sell-off of the debt-ridden dollar. There have many fine articles written about the proposed “euro-based” bourse and the devastating effects it will have on the greenback. The best of these are ‘’Petrodollar Warfare: Oil, Iraq and the Future of the Dollar’‘ by William R. Clark, and ‘’The Proposed Oil Bourse’‘ by Krassimir Petrov, Ph.D.

The bottom line on the bourse is this; the dollar is underwritten by a national debt that now exceeds $8 trillion dollars and trade deficits that surpass $600 billion per year. That means that the greenback is the greatest swindle in the history of mankind. It’s utterly worthless. The only thing that keeps the dollar afloat is that oil is traded exclusively in greenbacks rather than some other currency. If Iran is able to smash that monopoly by trading in petro-euros then the world’s central banks will dump the greenback overnight, sending markets crashing and the US economy into a downward spiral.

The Bush administration has no intention of allowing that to take place. In fact, as the tax-cuts and the budget deficits indicate, the Bush cabal fully intends to perpetuate the system that trades worthless dollars for valuable commodities, labor, and resources. As long as the oil market is married to the dollar, this system of global indentured servitude will continue.

[...]

full at --

<http://gnn.tv/headlines/7365/Annexing_Khuzestan_Battle_Plans_for_Iran>

.d.

---------

http://monroelab.net/blog/

<<<<<>>>>>

'Of course, you do realize this means war?" Bugs Bunny



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list