>There is a lot of Bad Prose on Wikipedia. It may not be the most
>critical problem with the site, but it very pervasive. Did you see
>this piece?
>
>http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/10/the_amorality_o.php
>
>This guy was spot on, and his comments were a great embarrassment to
>the Wikipedia community.
He's got a more recent piece at <http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/02/community_and_h.php>. It's pretty damning - and tears apart that Nature article that reportedly claimed that Wikipedia was as good as Britannica. Clearly it's not.
Doug