yes, it's a problem, but I think it's a mistake to call them "unproductive." They are directly unproductive in that they don't contribute directly to individual capitalist profits, but they are indirectly productive, in that they help the capitalist class as a whole.
-- Jim Devine
************************
Of course, the working class *is* organized, by the capitalist class for the uses and needs of the capitalist class. It is organized for servitude. For the most part, the working class believes that it is free and has no need for bureaucratic structures which sop its wages with more taxes in the form of dues. This belief that it is free is fostered by mainstream union organizers who claim that the workers and bosses have interests in common and that all the workers want is "a fair day's wage for a fair day's work". Hardly anyone tells them anything different, so it's no wonder the working class remains ignorant of its class interests, organized only for capitalist purposes. It has to go on its own instinct for freedom alone. Sometimes, in some workers, these instincts flair up in a fit of organizing or striking against their bosses and for themselves. But hardly anyone in the existing union movement would try to fan the flames of class consciouness. Best to let those embers die out. And that is why, IMO, the working class lies dormant, under the volcano, so to speak.
Regards, Mike B)
Read "The Perthian Brickburner": http://profiles.yahoo.com/swillsqueal
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com