Guest wrote:
>Of course he should provide for his woman, not the
>other way around. Oh the shame of it!
>
No shame at all. Just the likelihood, perhaps, that her support will be
taken for granted and that there will be little or no reciprocation. As
I said, the story of a woman financing a man's education and then being
dumped for someone younger and less tired is common as dirt.
Joanna
>
>