[lbo-talk] Social Democracy vs Marxism

joanna 123hop at comcast.net
Wed Jul 26 15:05:37 PDT 2006


I think it was

No body can organise a revolution. It happens. Any organised revolution is a contrived one and suffers from distortion. A party needs to be in place to take advantage of such situations. A comunist party cannot overcome fudalism to jump to Socialism. But A communist Party is better placed to achieve capitalism after thowing the feudal State as it can approach such a development in an orderly way compared to the market dictated unplanned chaotic development such as India is facing right now. So there is a need for a communist party in any stage of development provided that party does not confuse the prevailing stage and try to build socialism straight away.

-- kalalepsarathy

But now I see that he did answer it at the end.

Joanna

Carrol Cox wrote:


>joanna wrote:
>
>
>>So, are you saying that capitalism is the apex of social evolution? Or
>>that it was a necessary stage on the way to a to be hoped for socialism?
>>
>>Joanna
>>
>>
>
>Please don't assume that everyone has read a given post. Who are you
>replying to? Give us a hint at least of what he/she said.
>
>Carrol
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
>

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20060726/b6082016/attachment.htm>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list