[lbo-talk] Vote 2004: Why Kennedy and Rolling Stone Are All Wet

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Sun Jun 4 16:09:29 PDT 2006


On Jun 4, 2006, at 6:50 PM, Michael Pollak wrote:


> Just out of curiosity -- I assume they must have posted this short
> hand-out link of their boiled down arguments to the AAPOR list.
> Anybody bite?

I don't recall seeing it there, but with few exceptions, they've dismissed all challenges to the official line. Ron Baiman - whom I know through URPE conferences - was on a panel at the AAPOR conference in Montreal last month. (Guess Quebec is part of "America" for the organization's purposes.) Somehow it came up that Baiman (who's not on the list) was having trouble raising funds for the trip. Mitofsky got snooty said something like, well, I guess if his department isn't paying then his motives may not be "academic."

Doug



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list