[lbo-talk] Re: language of contempt

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Mon Jun 5 14:17:21 PDT 2006


On Jun 5, 2006, at 4:49 PM, JBrown72073 at cs.com wrote:


> Yes, I'm aware of the SB explanation for allegedly greater male
> slutiness,
> but I was being arch since I'm not familiar with a SB explanation
> for the bias
> against women for equivalent behavior.

I think SB is mostly post hoc stories invented to shore up the status quo in the guise of science, but isn't the standard line that men want to be sure any kids are theirs and not some other guy's, or they won't stick around to support them?

Doug



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list