In any case, I have to say I am ambivalent about the equivocation. Although strategically I think it is unhelpful. To the extent that it has caused any debate in the mainstream press it has simply been attacked as malicious rhetoric. As with any two complex cases enough differences can be found to justify a rejection of the equivocation. CUPE could have adopted any number of resolutions with any number of headings. Hell they could have even stood on the rock of democratic liberalism and supported Hamas as the legitimate democratic administration of the occupied territories and called for the full restaoration of funding. Then when the right attacked they could simply call them anti-democratic. As it stands they are spending all of their free time making the case that the two cases are the same. How would you rather spend your time?
Anyway I am not loosing any sleep over this matter.
tfast posted a note from Elleni Centime Zeleke :
> > My problem with the motion is the way it equivocates Israeli state
policy
> > with the policies stemming from both the British and Dutch colonial
> > interests in Southern Africa. In my mind, the Israeli state is many
things,
> > but the South African apartheid state it is not. To call one the other
is to
> > misunderstand the effects of European colonial policy in South Africa
and it
> > is to obscure the ways Israeli state policy has come to affect
Palestinians.
>
> What's in a name? To me, it doesn't matter whether or not CUPE calls
> Israel an apartheid state. Calling Israel a Jewish state is damning
> in itself, just as calling the United States a WASP state, calling
> Iran a Persian state (btw Ali Khamenei is an Azeri), calling India a
> Hindu state (Manmohan Singh is a Sikh), etc. would be, though the
> Israeli power elite, as well as their supporters, are proud that it is
> a Jewish state and insist that it has a God-given right to keep it
> that way by any means necessary.
>
> BTW, some Palestinians believe that what Palestinians under the
> occupation face is worse than apartheid. When John Quigley, a
> professor of international law at the Ohio State University brought
> Raja Shehadeh, a founder of Al-Haq and the author of Strangers in the
> House, to speak to some students and faculty, Shehadeh said that
> living under the Israeli occupation in the OPTs is more like living in
> ghettos than living in bantustans under apartheid. This is the way he
> put it in The Nation: "In one of the strange twists of history,
> Palestinians have now been confined within the borders of the expanded
> Jewish state in what are effectively Palestinian ghettos. Within these
> crowded enclaves they are allowed to govern themselves while being
> denied the right to enjoy the natural resources of the rest of their
> country" ("Bird on a Wire," 19 May 2005,
> <http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030519&s=shehadeh>).
>
> But if anyone wants to call Israel an apartheid state, I would be the
> last to cavil about word choice. A number of South Africans think it
> is:
>
> <blockquote>From: President,
> Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU)
>
> To: President,
> Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), Ontario
>
> June 6, 2006
>
> Brother Sid Ryan,
>
> On behalf of over 1.2 million South African workers organized under
> the banner of COSATU I greet you in the name of worker
> internationalism. It is this solidarity, since the formation of the
> very first union and across space and time, often in the face of harsh
> repression, that provided vital moral succour and allowed workers to
> strengthen their resolve against oppression and exploitation.
>
> In this spirit and with great pride, I congratulate CUPE Ontario for
> their historic resolution on May 27th in support of the Palestinian
> people -- those living under occupation and those millions of
> Palestinian refugees living in the Diaspora. We fully support your
> resolution.
>
> As someone who lived in apartheid South Africa and who has visited
> Palestine I say with confidence that Israel is an apartheid state. In
> fact, I believe that some of the atrocities committed against the
> South Africans by the erstwhile apartheid regime in South Africa pale
> in comparison to those committed against the Palestinians.
>
> The latest outrage by the apartheid Israeli regime -- the construction
> of the hideous Apartheid Wall -- condemned by the International Court
> of Justice -- extends the occupation of Palestinian lands, disrupts
> the already precarious economic, social, health and education well
> being of an entire people and entrenches the Bantustanisation of
> Palestine.
>
> When the governments of the world turn a blind eye to these
> injustices; when they are seduced by apartheid Israel's justification
> of brutality through the pretext of 'security'; when they silence
> criticism of state terror through the canard of 'anti-semitism' --
> then it is time for the global workers movement to stand firm and
> principled against hypocrisy and double standards. We cannot remain
> silent any longer. It is time to stand in word and in deed with the
> peoples of the Middle East and heed their call to support the struggle
> against occupation. There will be no peace in this region and in the
> world, without justice.
>
> Despite the action of some Western governments and big business,
> workers and democrats of the world including the citizens of Canada,
> heeded our call when we struggled against apartheid. Boycotts,
> disinvestments and sanctions against the apartheid regime in South
> Africa hastened our march to democracy. Why should it be different
> for Palestinians? In the face of an intransigent, arrogant, racist
> and brutal Israeli state, this strategy of isolation -- particularly
> since the vast majority of Palestinians support it -- should be
> applied to Israel as well. It is a peaceful option.
>
> South African workers will never forget the support given by the
> Israeli state to the apartheid South African regime. In the same way
> we will never forget the thousands of acts of solidarity of ordinary
> citizens around the world who sustained our struggle through the
> boycott weapon.
>
> COSATU supports the demand that Apartheid Israel must respect and
> implement all resolutions passed by the United Nations; that the right
> of return of Palestinian refugees must not be compromised; that Israel
> respects the democratically elected government of Palestine; and that
> Palestinian taxes collected by Israel must be returned to the elected
> representatives of Palestine unconditionally.
>
> Those supporting the ideology of Zionism and the pro-Israeli lobby
> will muster their substantial resources against you. Despite these
> pressures, we ask you not to doubt for a single moment the correctness
> of your just stand.
>
> We salute the courage and vision of CUPE Ontario's leadership and
> members in unanimously passing resolution 50. Your unwavering resolve
> inspires us, we who lived through decades of apartheid oppression, as
> it will undoubtedly inspire and endear you to millions of Palestinian
> and other freedom loving people throughout the world.
>
> In Solidarity,
>
> Willie Madisha President Congress of South African Trade Unions
> <http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/cosatu070606.html></blockquote>
>
> The point is that international solidarity with Palestinians against
> the Israeli occupation is not simply motivated by sympathy for
> long-suffering Palestinians -- it is also (perhaps more strongly)
> motivated by objections to Tel Aviv's foreign policy siding with
> Euro-American imperialists and their local collaborators in the past
> and present.
>
> --
> Yoshie
> <http://montages.blogspot.com/>
> <http://mrzine.org>
> <http://monthlyreview.org/>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk