Heidegger in the second part of B & T does discuss history in relation to Dilthey and someone else whose name I can't remember (he's forgotten today). But that is in the context of describing how the past is interpreted in the present as part of the anticipation of the future.
--- Charles Brown <cbrown at michiganlegal.org> wrote:
>
>
> But, there's more to be said and this is where
> Marx's particular genius
> (I refrain from capitalizing) comes in, and it is
> this: being in the
> historical (man made) world is different from being
> in nature and to
> become enlightened by "being in the world" in any
> kind of socially
> useful way means being able to look at that
> difference, to understand
> it, to understand how our historic/cultural
> happenstance textures our
> conditioning and our perception. This is not a
> trivial task and it was
> Marx alone who articulated i, who gave it
> philosophical weight, and made
> some intial forays.... Pity he has not had anyone
> able to take further
> steps.
>
> Comments? Anyone?
>
> Joanna
>
> ^^^^^
> CB: What might be some further steps ?
>
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
Nu, zayats, pogodi!
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com