Yeah, how amazing that the *opinion* of a bunch of dudes, who couldn't take credit for breaking a story that was happening in their backyard, does not prevent people from finding interesting a long, detailed article that actually tries to present some reasoning in favour of its thesis! "Logic and reasoning are so pre-Bush", they added in their weighty two sentence opinion!
> Joe Hallett, a longtime political reporter and columnist at the Columbus
> (Ohio) Dispatch and previously the Plain Dealer, took his own shot at
> Kennedy's theories in a Sunday column. He declared that "Democrats still
> haven't met the burden of proof" that the election was stolen.
Pressed on his mandate, as a reporter, to uncover the truth, he scoffed at the idea, "What's in it for me?", he exclaimed with indignation, "The Democrats can reach me at Harry's non-stop Go Go Rama if they come up with any proof. Of course by proof, I mean a really strongly worded opinion... not pesky logic".
> Weiser of the Enquirer adds that Kennedy's obvious Democratic leanings
> do not help the validity of his story. "If a major Republican was saying
> this, I might be paying more attention to it," he says.
That is if they manage to grab me before happy hour. After that, its all about the babes, you know what I am saying?
--ravi
-- Support something better than yourself: ;-) PeTA: http://www.peta.org/ GreenPeace: http://www.greenpeace.org/