[lbo-talk] violent crime up

Matt lbo4 at beyondzero.net
Thu Jun 15 06:35:45 PDT 2006


On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:43:55PM -0700, Miles Jackson wrote:
> Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> >Destined? No. More likely than an otherwise similiarly situated
> >foreigner? Probably yes. That's how statistical models work. Weren't
> >you just complaining about bad statistics?
>
> I have to agree: what's with this naive reasoning about causality? This
> reminds me of some students' reactions when I talk about the
> experimental research on the effects of exposure to aggressive role
> models: we know, as well as scientific research can demonstrate, that
> exposure to aggressive role models causes an increase in aggressive
> behavior in children. I'll get some students who protest: "not all
> children act aggressively when they're exposed to an aggressive role
> model!" as if this is a meaningful counterargument. Like most human
> social behavior, aggression is determined by multiple factors, ranging
> from biological to cultural. To assume any one of these is the crucial
> or necessary component is dubious; however, Jordan's view--if some gun
> owners aren't aggressive, availability of guns couldn't possibly
> increase aggression--is equally dubious.

Wait, "some" is what is dubious. Aren't we concerned about "some" when it means "an overwhelming majority". An overwhelming majority of gun owners are never going to be violent criminals at all, not just never going to *shoot* someone. I think Jordan's point is that the case hasn't been made that the legit question - why is the US so violent - validly leaps to "well there's all those guns". It seems to be just an arm-waving argument.

This is relevant if one is concerned with actually impacting how USers vote. 300 million gun owners makes them a huge demographic and to be this completely out of touch with what those working-class people are thinking is one of the reasons it is amusing to see people scratch their heads wondering why working-class people vote against their economic interests over silly "values". To a lot of those people their "gun rights" are a core value and being on the correct side to them is a core issue and impacts their voting.

Alas, if purity of thought is more important than pragmatism then carry on with the gun ownership->violent crime rhetoric.

Matt

-- PGP RSA Key ID: 0x1F6A4471 aim: beyondzero123 PGP DH/DSS Key ID: 0xAFF35DF2 icq: 120941588 http://blogdayafternoon.com yahoo msg: beyondzero123

I am the resurrection and I am the life, I couldn't bring myself to hate you as I'd like.

-Ian Brown



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list