>>Maybe more reporters doesn't
>>make for better news, but at least they can cover more. Also, isn't
>>concentration of control over important things bad just on principle?
>
>Under capitalism, I don't see why. There's still a structural
>relation of subordination; why is it better to have more oppressors
>than fewer?
The theory is that more variety means we can choose our our master. This competitive environment has, as everyone knows, led to the total elimination of bad bosses. At least it has for all those workers who are free to choose unemployment.
Bill Bartlett Bracknell Tas