this repeats what you said before, without providing any extra logic or information to shore up your argument. Nor did it reply to what I wrote. BTW, "credibility" to whom? Oh well...
hmm... But the bottom line ... is that there was a militarist and aggressive infrastructure in place in the United States that poses an immediate and grave threat to the world. Antiwars never had a plan for dealing with it and this accounts for their lack of credibility on the issue. -- Jim Devine / "There can be no real individual freedom in the presence of economic insecurity." -- Chester Bowles